Quick civics quiz; which political party’s leadership filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965? That would be the Democratic Party. No, really; the Democratic Party. Who knew? Apparently, not the 85–95% of black Americans who vote only for the Democratic candidates in election after election, decade after decade.
This is even more bizarre when you consider that the person leading the filibuster against both of these epic civil rights victories, specifically written to help black Americans, was a former Grand Dragon of the Ku Klux Klan, the Senate majority leader from West Virginia, democrat Robert Byrd. Who knew? Again, apparently not the vast majority of black Americans who continue to vote for Democratic candidates election after election.
How can any segment of our population be so completely unaware of such personally relevant and important historical information? How can any black American vote for any Democratic candidate, ever? Do they not know about Robert Byrd, Lester Maddox and George Wallace, really!?
Apparently not, but make no mistake; this is no accident. Objectively and honestly teaching our children American history is completely, and demonstrably, contrary to the best interests of the Democratic Party and the unions that control them. The institutional racism that the democratic party employs, and has mastered, through their control of K-12 and higher education, ensures that the under-educated, dependent class in our country will continue to grow, populated disproportionately with black Americans, for yet another generation. Vouchers now!
Patrick Delohery
Monument
save the whites posted at 2:45 pm on Sun, Feb 12, 2012.
So little racism, so much anti-racism. Anti-racists have to create right wing racists in order to have something to attack. They need to justify their hate of white people.
It is well said that ANTI-RACISM IS A CODE WORD FOR ANTI-WHITES.
Anti-whites of course go much further and support the ongoing genocide of the white race. Where would those who genocide whites be without anti-white supporters?
Yes, so little racism, so little racism. When we can come to a reasonable definition of racism, we could then use the term as more than just an attack tool against white people. Don't you agree.
Jenny Kimserick posted at 12:04 pm on Sun, Feb 12, 2012.
Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.
The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.